A drunken Halloween party-goer rousted by San Jose police on a hotel stairwell was shot by officers after he reached for a fake gun he had tucked into his surgeon's costume, authorities said.
Javier Gonzales-Guerrero, 25, of San Jose was shot by officers who confronted him at the Extended Stay Deluxe Hotel at 55 East Brokaw Road shortly before 8 a.m. Sunday, police said.
Officers found Gonzales-Guerrero either passed out or sleeping in a stairwell, said police Sgt. Jason Dwyer. They could see the butt of a gun in his waistband, Dwyer said.
They called out to him, and he awoke and reached for what turned out to be a gold-color fake firearm, police said.
Fearing he was going to shoot them, Sgt. Brian Johst and officers Mark Stephens, Gary Petrakovitz and Tim Stephens all fired at Gonzales-Guerrero, hitting him numerous times but not inflicting any life-threatening wounds, Dwyer said.
Investigators determined that Gonzales-Guerrero had attended a Halloween party dressed in medical scrubs.
The officers who shot their weapons have served between 13 and 20 years with the department.
The incident is the seventh San Jose officer-involved shooting this year, three of which have resulted in deaths. Police and the Santa Clara County district attorney are investigating the latest shooting.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/25/BAPJ1LM13V.DTL#ixzz1bpMdnBj2
Oct 16, 2011
Phoenix police shoot, kill man in wheelchair
"Phoenix police fatally shot a man in a wheelchair who they said had pointed a gun at them early Saturday morning.
Sgt. Steve Martos said two officers, whose names were not released, responded around 2:20 a.m. to the downtown bus and light-rail depot at 100 W. Van Buren St. after witnesses reported that shots had been fired by a man assaulting a female believed to be his girlfriend.
"Two officers approached the suspect and his girlfriend," Martos said. "As they approached the male suspect, he wheeled away from the officers and became belligerent. The suspect then turned back towards the officers and began approaching them."
The man then reached into his waistband and pulled out a handgun, pointing it at the officers, Martos said. The officers repeatedly commanded him to drop the weapon, Martos said, and when he refused, they shot him.
The man was pronounced dead on the scene. Neither officer was injured. The man's name was not released.
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2011/10/15/20111015phoenix-police-shoot-man-in-wheelchair-brk.html#ixzz1axtrRiV2
"
Sgt. Steve Martos said two officers, whose names were not released, responded around 2:20 a.m. to the downtown bus and light-rail depot at 100 W. Van Buren St. after witnesses reported that shots had been fired by a man assaulting a female believed to be his girlfriend.
"Two officers approached the suspect and his girlfriend," Martos said. "As they approached the male suspect, he wheeled away from the officers and became belligerent. The suspect then turned back towards the officers and began approaching them."
The man then reached into his waistband and pulled out a handgun, pointing it at the officers, Martos said. The officers repeatedly commanded him to drop the weapon, Martos said, and when he refused, they shot him.
The man was pronounced dead on the scene. Neither officer was injured. The man's name was not released.
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2011/10/15/20111015phoenix-police-shoot-man-in-wheelchair-brk.html#ixzz1axtrRiV2
"
Oct 3, 2011
Oakland officer videotapes his killing of suspect
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/03/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL
"In a Bay Area first, a fatal shooting by police in East Oakland was captured on video - not by a bystander with a camcorder or a smart phone but by the officer himself, who wore a city-issued camera on his chest.
Oakland police officials will not say what the footage from Sept. 25 depicts, citing an ongoing investigation. But the fact that the shooting was captured at all illustrates a profound change in law enforcement, with officers increasingly strapping on cameras along with their guns, radios and handcuffs.
The incident is already raising thorny questions, principally this: When an officer films his own killing of a suspect, should that officer be allowed to review the footage before making a statement to investigators?
Then there's this: In the weeks and months ahead, will the video be made available to the public or the media?
The shooting happened shortly before 5 p.m. on the 9900 block of Cherry Street. Police officials said the trouble began when two officers, who have not been identified, pulled over a car for an unspecified violation, only to watch the passenger flee on foot.
One officer caught the suspect, who had a gun and drugs, and shot him during a struggle, police said. The department has refused to identify the man, and the Alameda County coroner will not give his name without police permission.
At some point, the officer had turned on the camera, which is about the size of a pager and was clipped to his chest, by sliding down a lens cover.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1Zjx3izfa
After the shooting, neither the officer nor his partner was allowed to view the footage from the camera before speaking to investigators, said sources familiar with the matter.
That led to a dispute, the sources said, over whether the department followed policies adopted after the city bought 350 wearable cameras late last year from Vievu of Seattle for $540,000.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1ZjxAKqfw
Police watchdogs were surprised to hear of Oakland's position - that the officers should have been allowed to view the video first - saying it seemed to violate basic investigatory principals.
John Burris, an Oakland attorney who specializes in police misconduct cases and supports use of the body cameras, said officers who shoot suspects should not have access to such a video.
"Absolutely not," Burris said. "I think it's contrary to the importance of the video. If you view the video beforehand, you have an opportunity to change your story to match the video."
Michael Risher, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney in San Francisco, said, "In any investigation, it is not a good practice to show a tape to a witness before an interview. ... I think any police officer will tell you that."
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1ZjxFnF00
"
"In a Bay Area first, a fatal shooting by police in East Oakland was captured on video - not by a bystander with a camcorder or a smart phone but by the officer himself, who wore a city-issued camera on his chest.
Oakland police officials will not say what the footage from Sept. 25 depicts, citing an ongoing investigation. But the fact that the shooting was captured at all illustrates a profound change in law enforcement, with officers increasingly strapping on cameras along with their guns, radios and handcuffs.
The incident is already raising thorny questions, principally this: When an officer films his own killing of a suspect, should that officer be allowed to review the footage before making a statement to investigators?
Then there's this: In the weeks and months ahead, will the video be made available to the public or the media?
The shooting happened shortly before 5 p.m. on the 9900 block of Cherry Street. Police officials said the trouble began when two officers, who have not been identified, pulled over a car for an unspecified violation, only to watch the passenger flee on foot.
One officer caught the suspect, who had a gun and drugs, and shot him during a struggle, police said. The department has refused to identify the man, and the Alameda County coroner will not give his name without police permission.
At some point, the officer had turned on the camera, which is about the size of a pager and was clipped to his chest, by sliding down a lens cover.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1Zjx3izfa
After the shooting, neither the officer nor his partner was allowed to view the footage from the camera before speaking to investigators, said sources familiar with the matter.
That led to a dispute, the sources said, over whether the department followed policies adopted after the city bought 350 wearable cameras late last year from Vievu of Seattle for $540,000.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1ZjxAKqfw
Police watchdogs were surprised to hear of Oakland's position - that the officers should have been allowed to view the video first - saying it seemed to violate basic investigatory principals.
John Burris, an Oakland attorney who specializes in police misconduct cases and supports use of the body cameras, said officers who shoot suspects should not have access to such a video.
"Absolutely not," Burris said. "I think it's contrary to the importance of the video. If you view the video beforehand, you have an opportunity to change your story to match the video."
Michael Risher, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney in San Francisco, said, "In any investigation, it is not a good practice to show a tape to a witness before an interview. ... I think any police officer will tell you that."
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/02/MNGR1LBKEQ.DTL#ixzz1ZjxFnF00
"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)